Ideas for negotiating for non negotiators

I will start with the TLDR version - never be afraid to negotiate because there are always options.

Coming into this I realise there are many participants, and almost as many Independents and providers who know a lot about care and supports, but don’t really have a business or finance background.

As a participant there is a budget to manage, juggling allied health, medical care and supports, service agreements, equipment management, hidden fees, extra charges and also changing needs and lets not forget repeatedly proving you still need the help when there is a renewal on the way.

As providers there are budgets and their overheads, fees, training costs, staff costs if you have them, documentation, insurances and registration fees for some.

We are also in a period of uncertainty with the government and media swimming with speculation and droning on about cuts.

With all of this, there are some common themes that come up when it comes to negotiating the costs of services with a provider and some providers trying to work out how to cover their costs while still giving participants good service. There are some providers and independents who have overheads too high to allow them a lot of room to negotiate, but there are others who are able to get a little whimsical with service costs because of their structure so it never hurts to talk. Also don’t be shy about talking, the worst that can happen is that one of you decides to leave the negotiation. With 650,000 participants roughly nationally and over 250,000 providers and independents there are plenty of options and finding the right match for both parties is the aim. So, some common things that people have come to me with:

“I just received my hours from the plan manager and they have only allocated an hour a day, but the providers are insisting on a 2 hour minimum”.

A common problem now coming up is that businesses are having a hard time convincing workers to work a 2 hour or less shift. Some providers are starting to insist on a 3 hour minimum. This often means you have a hard time finding a support worker even if they are an independent. You sometimes don’t have an option to go back to the plan manager to explain this and get more hours. There are a couple of potential solutions to try and combat this. The first one can work with a lot of independents if you are willing to be flexible on time and day and they have other participants in your area. You can ask them what days and times they will already be close by and if they are willing to do and charge the one hour if you agree to have it straight before or after their other client/s that they are already doing on the days that they are there. Some may not be willing, but there definitely are some that are happy to do that. In some cases they may ask to add a travel fee from the first client to you to make it more financially viable for them. It works out to being better than the full 2-3 hours some are asking for. The other option is to go with one of the much larger contractor style providers. It can work but you may need to sift through a few support workers until a good fit comes through as they aren’t always great at matching workers to participant.

“I have my budget for capacity building and I feel like I need assistance a certain number of times per (insert period) but my budget wont cover the cost of an allied health professional coming out each time”

This can be a tricky one. Allied health professionals are important and there are definitely tasks only they can perform. But as most know, your capacity building budget is not always an amazing amount. In this instance you may want to talk to your allied health professional about using a level 2 allied health assistant to perform some of the tasks. For example, your physio has given you an exercise program that you need to do weekly, but your budget would only cover a monthly visit and a support worker may not have the skills to properly support the exercises and report back to the physiotherapist. A level 2 assistant is able and qualified to provide those supports unsupervised while following the allied health professionals directions. The hourly rate is lower than that of the allied health professional. Some allied health professionals have assistants on staff, but you can also opt to hire your own just like with support workers as long as your allied health professional agrees to work with them. A bonus tip is that some independent allied health assistants are happy to work for the support worker rate rather than the allied health assistant rate if your budget is lacking funding for allied health but does have support worker funding. And some are happy to combine support work hours and therapy hours if you have limited daily hours available.

“I have a lot of activities in the community that I like to attend but I don’t have the budget to attend all of them with a support worker, is there a way that I can make the budget spread further so I can do more?”

There is but it doesn’t always work for various reasons. I encourage participants to befriend other participants who enjoy similar activities (I facilitate this for clients by hosting get togethers but there are definitely many ways to meet up). The simplest way to get more out of your budget for community access is to attend with another participant (or more, up to 5 in fact) who also wanted to participate so that the amount that is invoiced by the support worker is divided by the number of participants going along.

In cases of 2:1 supports, higher needs 1:1 supports or social anxiety issues this isn’t a feasible choice. For those participants I recommend talking to the provider and seeing if you can negotiate a lower rate in exchange for ensuring a number of hours per month outside of holidays and other events. There are quite a few independents who are happy to charge less if it means they will have regular work. Another option is negotiating a flat rate. This can help if some of your hours are in the evening and if there is transport involved. Trying to calculate afternoon rates and dollars per km is easy for some but not so easy for others. There are some independents who are willing to charge a flat hourly rate on weekdays in exchange for regular shifts. This can make it a lot easier for a participant who can then just say they will be charged X amount for Y hours regardless of the time of day and whether there is transport involved. Those providers do tend to charge the max day rate though so it is best to sit and do a calculation yourself before the negotiation to see if you will be financially better off based on your normal activities.

“My funding is being whittled down by cancellation charges”

This is one where it is really important to look at the service agreement. Many providers say that they make it all clear and it is up to the participant. But not a lot of participants realise that cancellation policies are negotiable too. Each provider is also different. Some use 7 day policies, some 48 hours, 24 hours and some 3 hours. It all depends on their structure. Some will also wave cancellation charges under certain conditions (hospitalisation of participant or if they can find other work for example). Some charge travel fees as part of cancellation, some don’t. Some charge the full amount of the session, some only half. It is important to look at their policies and then look at your circumstances. Is the planned time they will come in the morning and you are not a morning person making you more likely to cancel? Are there periods where you will be in hospital short notice and will they excuse you from fees in those circumstances etc. There are many variables to consider. You should try to negotiate one that will lean in your favour.

I will leave it at that as it’s already a long post, I do ramble a bit. If anyone thinks of one and wants to see if any providers can come up with a creative solution feel free to post. Happy negotiating.

20 Likes

Its my main girl Ursula! :octopus: Hehe

This was super helpful. Especially the tip about checking with providers or independents to see when they’re already in the area for other participants. I hadn’t thought about working around those minimum shift times that way, but it makes a lot of sense and could save me from those 2-3 hour minimums.

I also really appreciate that you’re giving us a peek behind the curtain. Most providers wouldn’t bother elaborating on these kinds of details, so it’s great to hear from someone who’s willing to share how things work on their end. It really helps us participants understand where there might be some room for negotiation and what’s realistic to ask for.

I’m curious about the provider structure thing you mentioned. Is there a way to figure out which types of providers are more likely to negotiate based on how they’re set up? I’ve run into lots who weren’t open to negotiating at all, so knowing what to look for could be really useful.

Thanks for sharing all your tips Lauren, definitely some great insights here
which I’m going to use.

6 Likes

There are a lot of participants who don’t know the ins and outs of providers, but there are also quite a few providers who don’t fully understand the ins and outs of NDIS funding for participants. It’s a good learning experience to exchange information on both sides.

There are definitely quite a few who wont negotiate much. Some examples include larger companies with many clients already in rotation, many Allied Health Professionals in KPI based structures where the focus is more on achieving high hours Vs income turnover, new sole traders who haven’t realised its difficult to find first participants yet and any provider large or small that has taken on too many over heads too fast.

The last one a few people don’t understand so I will give you 2 classic examples I see.

  1. A provider who managed to start with a good participant base and wanted to look more professional. They go out and quickly rent an office space, hire an HR person, hire an accountant for payroll, hire a coordinator full time, get extras like work vehicles with logos, domain emails, hire someone to do advertising, full training for multiple workers, the works. Having all these non income generating staff to support, and all these added costs leaves practically no profit even at the top rate if the participant base is small. They over invested underestimating how fast the base would grow so even if they wanted to, they couldn’t negotiate.

  2. someone starting with no clients and deciding to get registered straight away thinking registration automatically leads to participants joining. They often don’t know what they need to register so they hire an advisory company to do all the compliance work, they then pay for registration. Then they might get their first client and find out that no one told them they need to audit again almost immediately because the original registration was provisionary and they need to pass with clients on board. So some of these small providers can be up to $8000 behind before they have made their first $1000. They also often cannot afford to be making deals.

Normally I tell clients to be straight up when looking for a provider. The first words out should be “Hi, I am a participant, I have a unique budgeting situation, are your rates open to negotiation?”. If you are making a facebook ad, include that you are looking for a provider willing to negotiate on rate. It will rule out quite a few providers but you will get people willing to talk. And like I said there is no harm, because worst case scenario is that one of you leaves the negotiation table. Typically you will find it is independents who kept overheads low and smaller 2-5 staff providers willing to come to the table.

I also tell participants to be mindful of what they are offering. If you are offering less than the SCHADS award would pay, you are not going to get anyone. It helps to brush up on the award so you can see what pays are attached to what workers and skills as well as knowing your price guide. Some providers just want the max rate, some just want to be better off than if they were working for someone else.

I recently had to turn someone down because of this issue. They were looking for a support worker who was also either a qualified therapist or primary school teacher (the second is an amazing unicorn and I wish more would join the industry). They wanted someone negotiable. I put my hand up and we had a chat.

The work was mostly occupational therapy and speech pathology work with some personal care, it was also evening work on weekdays. She mentioned there was no money left in the capacity building. Normally for the work I would do, the price guide would pay me a maximum of $86 per hour under unsupervised therapy level 2. If I worked for a company I would get $50-$55 an hour (if they weren’t ripping me off as an employee :joy:). Because she said that capacity was low but there was also personal care funding I offered the standard $67 which is less than a standard evening rate, less than the therapy rate and because of the nature of the disability I was willing to wave cancellation and travel fees. She refused this saying she did not want to pay the “max NDIS rate” and I asked her what her ideal would look like, because if we are close we might be able to come to an arrangement. She offered $30 an hour and some people would see that as reasonable compared to some incomes outside this industry. Ignoring overheads and taxes etc. I had to walk away, because even if I had no skills, no qualifications, no experience and I went to work for the absolute worst paying provider, I would still be getting $35 an hour. She was asking for a high skill worker to provide demanding specialised services for less than the minimum in the award. Financially for me it was not a viable long term contract and I would be giving up time I could give to much better arrangements.

The other issue with very low rates is that if the provider gets a better offer from someone else in your time slot, you run the risk that they will drop you to take on the better paying client leaving you back at square 1. It’s not that they want to be cruel, but, especially for a provider starting out, it makes more business sense to get more for the hours you are working. Loyalty does come into play as well. Having a good relationship between provider and participant can make a huge difference.

Any good negotiation should benefit all sides involved.

12 Likes

Wow… Just wow. I’ve never read anything like this on the net before. SO helpful and fascinating. I always felt too apprehensive about negotiating. Like Emma said, this is a really good peek behind the curtain.

Handy knowing the different financial scenario’s that providers can put themselves in, which can lead to either more or less pressure to get paid the max amount. How do you know all of this? You’d think that people would only know these sorts of things if they had been in these scenarios thamselves. You’ve obvioulsy been around the block in this industry Lauren.

I’ve never taken the time to get to know the SCHADS award, but i’m going to now.

OMG why has no one ever told me these things before!

This is honestly some of the most helpful information I’ve ever read for NDIS related issues we face. This is the sort of stuff they should have on the NDIS website.

Thankyou so much Lauren. You’re honestly amazing. You clearly have a really good understanding of what participants and providers go though.

2 Likes

What the heck is this about :joy: .

2 Likes

This: Things I love about working in this industry

You really do take the time to explain things well. Thankyou for taking the time for sharing all that. Really. It helps to understand why some providers might not have much wiggle room. I hadn’t considered how things like over-investing early on or having a high overhead could really limit their ability to negotiate. It’s good to know there are still options out there, especially with smaller or independent providers who might be more flexible and open to discussion.

I’m curious, is there a way to get a sense of a provider’s setup before starting those conversations? It’d be really helpful to know upfront who might be more open to negotiating and who might be a bit more rigid because of their structure. Knowing that could save a lot of time and help me focus on finding the right provider from the start. I guess it would be difficult to know. You’d just have to put feelers out and who ever is willing to negotiate is obvioulsy in a position to be flexible.

I also really appreciate the detailed examples you shared. They make it much easier and clearer to understand the challenges from the provider’s side. You’re the best teacher.

It’s clear that approaching these negotiations with the right mindset and information can make a big difference. Your advice has definitely given me some new strategies to consider and I feel a lot more confident about having these discussions now. Negotiating is something I never felt confident with. I always felt sly about it. But with behind the scenes knowledge, knowing that some are more than willing, it makes it feel not so confronting.

Thanks again for taking the time to explain all of this. It’s great to have such valuble insights to work with and I’m sure it’ll be a big help to many of us navigating these tricky waters.

My thoughts exactly. Its super useful stuff. Empowering.

1 Like

To be honest I know there are quite a few providers who don’t like clients trying to negotiate because they simply can’t afford to come to that table. But I also know the vast majority of participants don’t negotiate and just accept rates. There are good fits for everyone.

Before joining this industry I gained certificates in business, finance and negotiation. There are a lot of people in the industry that lack those skills and because they lack them they don’t know how to market themselves, do market research or how to work out what their minimum viable offers are. They also don’t know how to determine what their own weaknesses are. It is part of the reason so many independents and small providers collapse. I know my weakness is advertising, I have been so very lucky that my clients love to talk about me and so it has brought me word of mouth business. But I do still need those skills to grow.

I speak to a lot of providers, I have worked for providers in aged care, support work and allied health and seen how they run. I have also worked for companies like five good friends to see how they run. I work with Independents in some scenarios. I know we are all supposed to be competitors but sometimes we can negotiate in each others favours. I talk to all of my participants and their friends to get to know what needs are in the areas I am looking for work and also where there are niches I can fit in. Most importantly it is all talking.

The easiest rule of thumb is if it varies on different companies service agreements, it is negotiable. There are very few things set in stone other than max rates that can be charged and even then you can sometimes get a little creative.

3 Likes

Unfortunately there is no set and fast way. Providers are humans. NDIS is vague and mysterious.

Sometimes people really want work and can’t negotiate but still say they can just to try and get the conversation happening hoping they get lucky.

You can ask them about their structure. Ask them are they on their own or do they have staff? (some sole traders have staff, they can technically have up to 5), Are they registered?, Do they have an example of their service agreement you can quickly look over to check fees?

Sometimes the number in your head and the number in theirs is going to be too far apart.

People have “Icks” where they start the negotiation but then something pops up that is a red flag in their mind and they bail (this happens on both ends. I have seen some independents tell participants they “don’t wash bums” or only do social stuff. I have also seen participants turn down some really good workers based on age, gender, nationality and all sorts of other things).

Another option they can sometimes give is if they have someone “less qualified” than their main people who can do a lower than normal rate. I put it in the quotation marks because it can mean a few different things. Most people know the main meaning, less qualified.

A good example of a different meaning is that one of my staff has 15 years experience, she specialises in several things that I don’t, she is fantastic with clients. She is also one of the people who trained me to work in this industry and some of the things she showed me have been invaluable. But she is considered less qualified because she comes from the era where you did not need certificates to prove you were qualified. She has been doing this since before the certificates existed. So if I have someone who wants therapy services for a support worker rate but can’t do my $67 per hour, she does it for $55 because she’s “less qualified”. That is why I said in my example if the client was close enough we might be able to sort out an arrangement. You as a participant looking outside in would not be able to tell that kind of information from a facebook post or advertisement. It would only be made known during negotiations.

3 Likes

Awesome thread Lauren. This whole discussion about provider flexibility is really interesting. I never thought to just ask directly about their setup before starting negotiations, that seems like a smart way to get a sense of what’s possible. Having a checklist in your mind would help guide the interaction and keep your on track.

Talking about “less qualified” staff offering lower rates caught my attention too. Obviously your friend would be brilliant, but out of a sheer technicality, it is offered at a lower rate. It’s good to know there might be options like that on the table, even if it’s not immediately obvious.

I’m wondering, though, how do you usually handle it when things are going well in a negotiation but then something just doesn’t sit right? Do you just call it off, or is there a way to address those red flags without derailing the whole conversation? It seems like a tricky situation to navigate.

Loving this thread btw.

@Emily @Owen23 I think you guys would find this conversation helpful.

Oooh yes. Definitely relevant @Sophia

The risk of losing a provider to a better offer has crossed my mind before, and it’s tough to find that balance between getting a good deal and making sure the provider feels valued. I’ve had a couple of experiences where a provider suddenly became unavailable, and now I get why it’s so important to build a good relationship. It’s not just about the rate; it’s about finding someone who’s invested in the long-term partnership.

I’ve also noticed that when I’ve been able to establish a good rapport with a provider, they’re often more willing to be flexible or go the extra mile, even if the rates aren’t ideal. It’s a reminder that communication and mutual respect can go a long way in these situations.

Your point about being upfront with budget concerns right off the bat really hit home for me too. I’ve hesitated in the past, worrying it might turn providers off, but it seems like honesty is the best policy. Better to find out sooner rather than later if it’s not going to work.

@Lauren have you found that some providers are more open to creative solutions, like bundling services or finding alternative ways to stretch the budget? I’ve had mixed results, so it’d be interesting to hear if you’ve seen any approaches that tend to work better than others.

1 Like

You can tell you’ve got the business sense behind you. Great at explaining things too.

You’ve got some good advice here, especially about knowing when a provider might not have the flexibility to negotiate. I’ve found it’s usually better to be straightforward about budget right from the start. No point wasting time if it’s not going to work out.

One thing I’ve been thinking about is the idea of locking in long-term agreements. It could be a way to offer providers some security, which might make them more open to negotiating rates. Have you seen that work for others?

Thank you Sophia. When it was first mentioned to me that I might want to talk about something through the forum, I did wonder a bit if I made the right choice out of so many options. I think the discussion has managed to become quite robust.

The red flag issue is definitely a spicy one to tackle. It depends on if its your end or theirs and if its a complete deal breaker or if the flag suddenly jumped up in readiness to wave (sometimes called orange flags).

I try to avoid red flag triggers where I can. From a participants side the biggest tip you can use is never use the words cheap and expensive in the negotiation. They are abrasive and rub people the wrong way. Compare the sentences:

Wow, your prices are cheap => Hey, your prices are really cost effective
I think your prices are too expensive for me => I think your prices might not be cost effective for me

The idea is to not have walls put up. People are weird about certain words. Some people use aggression to negotiate, but if you are not a negotiator naturally, you are better off non abrasive as your tactic. As it will keep communication flowing.

In the example about the lady above that I used it started out right and then went south but could have ended differently. Things that went right:

  1. she was clear from the start about what she wanted
  2. she was clear from the start she wanted to negotiate
  3. she was able to list what services, days and times she needed
  4. she let the provider open with the first offer

Where things went wrong:

  1. she didn’t research the value of the services she was asking for
  2. she made an offer a long way from the provider bid without a reasoning (sometimes you can sway someone if there is a very valid reason for asking for that rate)
  3. She started to get abrasive

I chose to walk away because really I only had to other options beside that. Explain why I’m awesome and charging the rates I am charging and come across as a condescending ass or explain a full break down of rates and come across like I’m trying to make her look dumb. Neither are outcomes I want and neither are worth spending my time on when I already know this is not a viable long term contract for me.

Things she could have done differently would be to explain her funding situation in more detail or to make a bid that was closer and more realistic once she had seen what the provider believed they could offer. The reality is customer wants what they want and seller has to meet their bottom line. She obviously believed she could get a better deal and I know that while I currently have time slots available, I am not in dire need of more work. If either of our needs were more urgent, one of us might have been willing to settle for an unfavourable deal.

If I am negotiating and I see that I have suddenly become a red flag to the other party I will usually ask which part caused it. Some people give you radio silence while others give you their perspective. Not every negotiation can be saved.

Willingness definitely varies and it can be personal preference or driven by business choices.

Being up front about your situation is the best policy. Newer providers who are struggling to get their first clients may also be more open to whimsy. Also being flexible helps providers think outside the box a fair bit.

1 Like

I would love a good 2 year contract :sweat_smile:

The main issues are the volatile nature of NDIS funding, participants changing needs over time and the changing costs and codes of services. All of these can quickly turn any long term agreement on it’s head.

1 Like

Ahhh, of course.

I guess if either party became disgruntled in the relationship, especially the participant, that it would go against the choice and control side of things. You can’t really ethically force someone who needs care to stay with a provider. Maybe legally. But I can see how a “contract” in NDIS wouldn’t really be enforceable without the provider being made to look bad.

The care industry is unique in this instance. NDIS adds another layer to this. A lot of the options that other industries have at their disposal aren’t possible in this industry.

It’s definitely one of the first I have worked in that feels like it runs on a lot of the good old “gentlemen’s agreement”.

1 Like

Haha yes, lots of that going on in this industry. Makes it wild.

Participants can muck providers around and vice versa.

1 Like

Yes. I have been burned as a provider. I have seen plenty of burnt participants too.

And that doesn’t even take the self funded people into account. They are a whole other crazy ride.

Hey, appreciate the breakdown, it’s like getting the cheat codes for the NDIS game! I’ve been in that “let’s talk rates” conversation a couple of times since getting my plan, and yeah, it’s always a bit of a dance.

I’ve definitely run into those big providers who are like, “This is the price, take it or leave it.” It’s kind of like trying to bargain with a vending machine. But the smaller, more flexible folks, now that’s where you can have a real conversation.

Sometimes I just go in with, “Look, I’m not exactly rolling in funding here, what can we work out?” It’s surprising how often they’re willing to meet me halfway, or at least somewhere closer to my budget.

Thanks for the tips, though, it’s got me thinking about my next round of negotiations. Maybe I’ll even manage to get a little extra time out of it.

Cheers for the advice!

No problem, I am glad you found it useful.