Effective Complaints, How to Raise Your Concerns

In the world of NDIS, when things are going well, it can be fantastic. Being supported and achieving your goals are the main objectives and can provide immense benefits to participants, families and even goal orientated support workers.

But what can we do when things go wrong? How do we communicate, who do we communicate to and what can we do if we cannot reach a resolution? What do providers do with my complaints?

Knowing your service agreement

Before starting with any company or independent, you should get familiar with their service agreement. We did look at this in the article Service agreements and you: What do you need to know? .

I won’t go over all of it again, but we will look at the complaints section.

feedback

In a good service agreement there should be at least two methods of contact in order to make a complaint or give feedback directly to the provider. This is to ensure accessibility. I highly recommend putting complaints in writing via text or email. This gives you a record of the date the issue was raised and the issue discussed so you have an unaltered record. This can be before or after the complaint is discussed. You can email the complaint and arrange a discussion or you can discuss the complaint and follow it with an “as discussed” email. Forwarding an email to the commission is also easier than typing it all out again.

Some companies have an online portal with a feedback form that can be used.

The service agreement should also always list the NDIA contact information and the quality and safeguards commission contact information. This is important should you need to escalate either a serious/criminal matter or a matter that your provider is not resolving.

Something else some companies will have that most independents don’t is a set of policies and procedures for managing complaints internally. These aren’t normally needed by participants but in the event of a serious issue it can somtimes be useful information to have. You are within your rights to ask for a copy of these documents from your provider. These policies should be customer focused if using best practice. You are also within your rights to ask for copies of any documents or notes kept about you.

Where do we begin

In Get on the ROAD: Navigating difficult conversations with your support worker we looked at how to have a performance management conversation with a support worker directly. In a company you also have the option to talk to the workers manager to deal with situations that come up. Using these tools effectively, most issues will not need to go further than having this conversation and seeing improvements or deciding to part ways. Not every working relationship is going to work but open and effective communication are always key to a good outcome.

What do independents and companies do with my complaints?

There are some things that both independents and companies should be doing with complaints and feedback if they are using best practice.

Keeping records

All providers should be keeping detailed records of complaints and feedback. They should also be recording the steps they took to resolve any issues. These are both important if they are ever audited or if a complaint is ever escalated to the quality and safeguards commission. You have the right to request copies of anything documented about you.

Providing you with feedback

All providers should be providing you with feedback regarding action they have taken to resolve the issue. An important reason for this is to convey that they have actually understood the complaint or feedback.

Maintaining a QIP

QIPs or Quality Improvement Programs (also known as continuous improvement programs) are policies and programs designed to improve services and outcomes. These will include the record of incidents and resolutions, records of activities seeking feedback ( regular surveys, feedback forms, passive collectors) and internal reviews to gain insight into potential improvement.

Maintaining privacy and confidentiality

We all know that maintaining privacy is one of the fundamental rules held by the NDIA when it comes to working with participants. All providers including independents must have a privacy and confidentiality policy.

Side note: An interesting trend I am noticing is providers posting participants personal information/ circumstances/ issues under “anonymous” on Facebook to get feedback about it. This is actually a serious breach of the privacy act and your rights if it ever happens to you. Fun fact: if you recognise something is about you and make a formal complaint, facebook can be compelled to identify the account that made the annoymous post. Very helpful if you plan to take legal action.

Responding to complaints quickly

Participants have the right to have complaints dealt with within an appropriate timeframe. Some things take time to fix while others are urgent. Best practice would have the provider notify you of a resolution time frame in writing but I notice most do so verbally. This isn’t usually an issue unless they fail to deliver.

I made a complaint but the provider downplayed it or said it was standard practice

This is something that I am noticing becoming more common. If you are ever unsure or feel the information the provider gave was incorrect you have 3 main resources that you can reach out to:

Your care coordinator (if you have one)
Your LAC or LAC team leader
The NDIA directly although this option may take more time

Any of these three should be able to tell you whether or not something is right.

When it comes to payments and fees, knowing your pricing arrangements (https://www.ndis.gov.au/providers/pricing-arrangements) can really help you spot issues and negotiate with providers.

Knowing your service charter ( https://www.ndis.gov.au/about-us/policies/service-charter) and the code of conduct (NDIS Code of Conduct | NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission) can help you identify when you are not being treated with the dignity and respect you deserve. I encourage participants to use the points and language from the charter and code when writing their complaints, both to providers and to the commission. It will help you better articulate the reasoning behind your complaint in a way that aligns with NDIA policy.

When to go to the quality and safeguards commission

There are going to be some issues you don’t resolve and just walk away from. There are bad providers, and there are providers who are just bad at their jobs.

You should go to the commission any time:

  • A provider has given an unsatisfactory resolution to a serious breach
  • Your privacy is not properly protected
  • You have been financially, verbally, physically or emotionally abused by a provider
  • Services were not provided in a safe or respectful way
  • You were a victim of fraud
  • You came to physical harm through the actions of a provider (or lack of actions in some cases)

The complaints process starts with either filing an online form or directly phoning the commission
(https://www.ndis.gov.au/contact/feedback-and-complaints).
The commission will investigate your complaint. In some instances you may not get feedback regarding the results of the investigation and in others you may be part of the outcome.

Something not many people know is that if you are not happy with the outcome of the investigation, you are able to take your complaint to the commonwealth ombudsman for review. Hopefully it does not get to that stage, but they are a very helpful bunch.

Something I see a lot on facebook and reddit is people saying that the commission won’t investigate independents. This is false, the commission will happily investigate anyone, apparently even if they never provided a paid service which was a fun experience. Independents are providers, just like companies, and they are subject to the same safeguard policies.

What happens to providers who are found to have committed serious offences?

For more serious criminal offences some face legal ramifications. But in most cases providers are placed under banning orders.

There are lists available online of banned people and providers as well as an ABN look up to make checking your new provider easy ( Compliance and enforcement actions search | NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission).

I am hoping I have touched on each section with enough information to be useful, but not enough to overwhelm everyone. All of the links will take you to resources and further explanations. Remember you have the right to ask your providers for any documents regarding you and any policies they may have that affect how your services are provided.

The most important point is to know that minor issues can be gradually escalated through the different stages but serious breaches should always go straight to the commission. If in doubt, reach out. There are so many providers out there and reporting a bad one quickly helps you, but also protects others who may come into contact with that provider.

15 Likes

FunnyClapGIF

As always, very nicely written.

Using the NDIS service charter and code of conduct when writing complaints is very nifty. I’ve had a hard time writing feedback sometimes. When it comes to the NDIS though, if I can use their own language, it’ll be like cheat sheet for handling issues.

1 Like

It can make it much easier to understand where they are going wrong from a providers perspective. It can also help participants feel confident that they do in fact have a valid complaint as I know sometimes people aren’t sure and worry about “rocking the boat”.

Nice breakdown. I’ve had a few minor issues with my provider but wasn’t sure if they were worth escalating. After reading this, I feel more confident about when and how to raise concerns.

1 Like

If you ever hit a real curve ball always reach out. Even here in the forums people have great insight and information.

About the privacy breaches. I’ve seen posts like that before and I had no idea it was such a serious violation. Makes me think twice about what I see in those forums.

If someone could identify the participant from the information provided then it was too much information. Doesn’t matter if it is a staff member, a family member or anyone else.

Privacy and confidentiality must be maintained. You can’t go online and share someones disability, the area they live in, descriptive information and whatever grievances you are having with them online to become fodder for social media gossip. Same for staff issues. These are conversations for your HR or legal advisor in private.

A lot of people forget their business page isn’t their personal page and they shouldn’t treat it like a personal page. Any time you want to talk about a participant on social media or share an image etc you actually need consent. I have a couple of participants who don’t mind being on my pages or being used as part of my educational tools. And I have others who have specific reasons for wanting none of their images or details shared. I have to respect both.

Going online to whine about people anonymously or try and rally support against them is definitely not respectful.

It’s funny how we take privacy for granted until it’s breached. I can’t believe people actually post participant info, even anonymously! Definitely keeping this info on hand just in case.

1 Like

Definitely. There have been cases of newer “business owners” especially doing AITA posts on reddit about participant interactions and have been recognised immediately and reported by participant family members.

It would be good if NDIA required everyone to have a strong social media policy because quite a few dont mentally link social media with their privacy and confidentiality policies. We are just too used to sharing everything.

This thread is such a lifesaver. Dealing with issues alone can feel isolating, but knowing others are going through it too somehow makes it easier to handle. Thanks Lauren for making it feel less like an uphill battle.

1 Like

No problem. I have found its best to view disability as a community. Everyone working together to provide informal supports even online can really help with mental health and outcomes.

Lauren, you just gave me a lot more confidence to actually stand up for myself in this system. It’s easy to feel like you have to just “accept it and move on,” but knowing there are layers to deal with problems makes a huge difference. Thankyou.

1 Like

Any time. Always remember its more effective to use NDIA language and there is always help available. With those two pieces of knowledge it becomes a lot less daunting.

Gotta say Lauren, this is gold.

Not sure how many times I’ve just brushed things off because I didn’t know where to start with complaints. Having it all laid out like this makes it way less intimidating.

1 Like

Getting started is usually the hardest part of everything we do. Hopefully this helps make the muddy waters of ndis a little more clear.

Man, what you said about independents and record keeping hit hard. My last support worker was amazing but had ZERO paperwork. Makes me wonder what would happen if something went wrong and there was no documentation.

1 Like

@Lucas I know this is going to sound negative, but its an article about complaining, so I’m going to express myself freely here. Most independents have no clue what they’re doing. They’re just winging it because it seems like a cool gig to get into.

Most have never worked in a care environment before, they don’t document, they don’t do risk assessments and they would have no clue about what to do in an emergency situation.

This is why I only work with NDIS companies who give me the impression that they’re professionals and have old school real experience looking after us.

Like Lauren said on her job ad article, you’re having to sift through a bunch of people who can’t even be bothered saying anything other than “Interested”. That’s even if you tell these people to email you. Then when some people email you they don’t even bother writing a cover letter or giving a resume.

The standard is very low.

On the other side of the coin, there are some independents who are very competent and engage in documentation etc, but they are unicorns.

I hope this comment isn’t too negative. Delete it if it is.

1 Like

Yeah @Michael7 you’re 100% right. Have to laugh at some. You see a participant on a facebook page looking for an independant support worker. When you look at some of the comments and then click through to the profiles of these people, sometimes you see that the profile pic is of that person doing the finger to the camera or taking drugs or half naked. Then you scroll through their profile and see some of the comments they’ve made being super nasty to others.

Like c’mon, at least make the effort to create a second profile where you present yourself in a favourable light :joy:.

Not all are like that though and even if some of these people aren’t good with paper work, some can still just be brilliant human beings who just lift you up with their presence. This is who I was referring to with my previous comment.

Yep, this is what I mean. Just unprofessional. Zero effort. If you can’t be bothered to display a yourself in a professional light you aren’t going to be bothered to look after someone else properly.

Even if someone is a brilliant human, I still prefer a brilliant human who has some kind of support training at a minimum.

1 Like

@Michael7 and @Lucas unfortunately there is no standard of best practice to guide independents, or even providers for that matter until audit.

The way NDIA words this is also confusing and convoluted for most people, let alone an industry where a lot of the work force are english as a second language. You could interpret just about everything including insurance as optional.

NDIA does this purposefully to make it easy to issue banning orders or refuse invoices with justification. It is part of why a lot of independents get locked out after audit.

There is a minimum line that NDIA likes to move at its own whim, and there are too many rumours that being an independent in this industry is easy and all you need is a police check, wwc and a car.

This is part of why I would welcome some kind of mandatory minimum registration or documentation package sold by NDIA to ensure minimum compliance.

To make things worse sometimes NDIA wont even explain to independents why they are on payment block so they don’t know what to do to rectify it. They also goal post shift. When someone made a false complaint against my business, NDIA asked me for a set of documentation. I provided everything asked, but I was then told I had missed others that weren’t mentioned. I provided those with the explanation that they had not asked. They then sent a third request which I had to fill before I was cleared.

It really is as clear as muddy water. But if a provider or independent hasn’t done their due diligence for the bare minimum, being a good person who means well wont protect a participant if there is an incident. Insurance is also looking for any excuse not to pay claims and NDIA finding a person non complaint is a great one.

1 Like